Pennsylvania woman granted retrial after being convicted of homicide due to unreliable bite-mark evidence

A Fayette County judge determined in a hearing that the bite-mark expert “could not testify to a reasonable scientific degree of certainty about the validity of bite-mark analysis.” The expert later told the judge “he started to doubt the validity of bite-mark analysis in 2008 when the National Academy of Science found the technology is not scientific and that several people among a group of 100 might produce the same bite mark.”  Crystal D. Weimer, 38, had been convicted of third-degree homicide and criminal conspiracy in this case and was serving a sentence of 15 to 30 years in prison.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: