L.A. Times on PCast

For news coverage of the forthcoming PCAST report, see this L.A. Times story:

“In what is likely to be its most controversial finding, the report states that analysis linking firearms to bullets and shell casings ‘falls short’ of scientific standards for admission as evidence. If judges permit such testimony, the report says, they should tell jurors that error rates by firearms examiners are higher than would be expected.

The report also calls into question DNA analysis of ‘complex’ mixtures of human fluid, such as those from puddles of blood from multiple people, saying such tests fail to meet rigorous scientific standards. It found that more straight-forward DNA and fingerprint comparisons met scientific standards, however.”

During the call announcing the report, Eric S. Lander, co-chair of the council, noted: “you can’t you can’t call a method valid and reliable unless you have tested.”

Published by BGarrett

Professor of Law, Duke University

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: